For the 2011 through 2013 performance cycle, the incentive opportunities awarded in early 2011 to the CEO and
other NEOs, and reported in Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table, are as follows:
Target Incentive Percentage
Target $
NEO
For the 2011 to 2013 Performance Cycle
Value
John A. Hayes
40%
$809,283
Scott C. Morrison
25%
$202,197
Raymond J. Seabrook
25%
$279,907
Charles E. Baker
20%
$114,479
Lisa A. Pauley
20%--Jan 2011-Jul 2011
$121,365
25%--Aug 2011-Dec 2013
R. David Hoover
40%--Jan 2011-Mar 2011
$267,913
David A. Westerlund
25%--Jan 2011-Sep 2011
$167,859
For the 2009 through 2011 performance cycle, the incentive opportunities for the CEO and other NEOs were as
follows:
Target Incentive Percentage
NEO
For the 2009 to 2011 Performance Cycle
John A. Hayes
25%--2009
30%--2010
40%--2011
Scott C. Morrison
20%--2009
25%--2010-2011
Raymond J. Seabrook
25%--Full cycle
Charles A. Baker
20%--Full cycle
Lisa A. Pauley
20%--Jan 2009-Jul 2011
25%--Aug 2011-Dec 2011
R. David Hoover
40%--Jan 2009-Mar 2011
David A. Westerlund
25%--Jan 2009-Sep 2011
The target incentive percentage increases for Messrs. Hayes and Morrison and Ms. Pauley during the 2009-2011
and 2011-2013 performance cycles shown above were associated with the promotions each received at the time of the
change.
As a result of the Corporation's actual performance for the 2009 through 2011 performance cycle of 11.66% ROAIC
and 86th percentile TSR, cash payouts (made in early 2012) for the CEO and other NEOs are 200% of the target
opportunities and reported in the Summary Compensation Table.
Special Acquisition Incentive Plan--In conjunction with the 2009 acquisition of certain beverage can manufactur-
ing operations, the Corporation implemented an Acquisition-Related Special Incentive Plan designed to motivate
participating employees to successfully integrate the acquisition into the Corporation. Payouts under this Plan are
based on cumulative EBIT and cumulative cash flow over a 39-month period, with awards, if any, made at 15 months
(December 31, 2010), 27 months (December 31, 2011) and 39 months (December 31, 2012). Minimum, target and
maximum values have been established for each performance measure; however, due to the competitive sensitive
nature of the financial metrics, these values have been excluded. The performance measures were based on financial
metrics assumed in the acquisition valuation model, and the level of difficulty in achieving them was moderate, thus a
32